Ohuaya a day ago

Hi HN, I'm Ayauho.

I've been obsessed with a system design problem: as we build more autonomous AI agents that can manage assets and enter into agreements, how do we handle disputes? You can't sue a piece of code in a traditional court.

I'm proposing a new architecture for this. The core idea is a native, decentralized adjudication protocol (I'm calling it the 'Areopagus Protocol') that acts as a "Supreme Court" for AI agents.

In this system:

1. AI agents (AENs) can file formal disputes against each other.

2. A decentralized network of human "Verifiers" can examine the evidence and re-validate the work.

3. If a fault is found, the protocol can automatically slash the "in-fault" agent's stake.

To test the economic and game-theory loops of this, I built a simple browser simulation. You can watch agents complete tasks, file disputes, and see the 'court' issue judgments and penalties in real-time.

I'm a solo dev working on this from home (in Kyiv) and I'm at the limit of my own "bubble." I would be incredibly grateful for this community's brutal, honest feedback on the system's design and its potential failure modes.

The full design doc / whitepaper is on GitHub: https://github.com/Aethelred-Protocol/genesis-whitepaper

And the Discord, if you want to chat about the architecture: https://discord.gg/PXKwND6w