Calling it "the best" is assuredly shortsighted. One only has to go back a little while in history to find very effective ways to tax the ultra rich. The one big caveat is that choosing one of these ways require a bit of historical perspective, which we assuredly lack.
posted with a gift link, but here it is in case the link gets changed: https://www.nytimes.com/2025/10/31/business/economy/wealth-t...
Calling it "the best" is assuredly shortsighted. One only has to go back a little while in history to find very effective ways to tax the ultra rich. The one big caveat is that choosing one of these ways require a bit of historical perspective, which we assuredly lack.